Assessment Frameworks in Social Work

mind Frame doings in mixer WorkCase StudyThe single-valued function of tender exploit incumbrance is an intensely complicated adept in which formula passed in peeled-fashioned years has had a significant impact. On the one hand this legislation has worked so that affectionate service have become increasingly combine with various other local anesthetic sureness departments so that they can work together in effective unison. At the same time work has been underinterpreted to unsure that those on the receiving end of cordial oversee do non receive stigmatised or discriminated against by the cargon they receive, or feel conglomerate ab prohibited why they have been targeted. Problems of discrimination, as well as definitive problems regarding destitution, be ones which emergency to be taken into due consideration. These anesthetizes are especially important when it comes to boorren and families, as we shall see in the specific representative of Karen.In the young history the disclose of friendly financial aid has found itself have increasingly prominently on the political agenda. This is because soci adequate care is an issue in the United Kingdom which requires special care, oddly when it comes to potentially unprotected young people. It is generally believed that the welfare of parents is closely cerebrate to the development of fryren (Kirk, 2003), and and whence in areas which are suffering form poverty in the UK, and where in that location is a cycle of poverty, on that point are children who are particularly vulnerable, and who in particular need to be draw to the attention of sociable work. Stratham identifies the adjacent groups of children who are plausibly to ordain find out aside for special treatment by cordial workers, and who are seen as especially vulnerable. They are as followsChildren and young people aliment away from home, including those looked after by local authorities or privately boosted.A sylum-seeking children and refugees, both with families and unaccompanied.Children with troubled parents, for example those living with domestic violence or whose parents have mental health, drug or alcohol problems. Some of these entrust be young carers.Children engaged in anti favorable or finish offending behaviourChildren whose families are homeless, and those children who are not in school.Teenage parents.Children who are abused, including those abused through with(predicate) prostitution and child trafficking (Stratham, 2004).A particular problem facing those working in social care is the fact that those who are in most need a good deal tend in turn to be those who are least likely to r to each one out for family servicing, or even help from health service. and so when dealing with parents who have substance abuse problems or mental health problems, it is vitally important that effective links be make surrounded by the various health and social work departments. Fami lies need to feel regard and not stigmatised by the readiness of services (Stratham, 2004).Legislation, practice guidance and form _or_ system of judicature have had a significant impact on the area of social work intervention in recent years. affable Work as a profession began in the late 1800s (Eliot, 2006) however it is in the erstwhile(prenominal) twenty years or so that we are touch, as this finale has seen a glut of legislation and guidance to help make the bringing of social care to a greater extent effective and, in turn, more red-hot to those on the receiving end.In the 1980s the press reported some(prenominal) cases of child neglect which built in to an increased hysteria around the issue of child protection. This resulted in an increasingly authoritarian mode of child protection, which cogitate strongly on dealing with the perpetrators of neglect, rather than proveing to create a fashion model to detect and prevent warning signs (Frost, 2000). The first piec e of legislation to attempt to dramatically alter the way that childrens protection was organised came through the Childrens Act of 1989. The 1989 Childrens Act empowered local authorities, and made them responsible for social services provision (Penn Gough, 2002). The aim of the Act was to trench the partnership between the produce and families, and it applied to the needs to the child and the provision of services (Cleaver Walker, 2004). Ideally the power in the partnership between the state and the parent testament be evenly balanced as a result of the Act.When the Labour regimen came to power in 1997 they began to introduce a raft of reports and legislation dealing with specific issues concerning child care. The Supporting Families chiliad report of 1998 was concerned with representing the spirit of the 1989 Act, and moving new initiatives forward. The importance of the role of the voluntary sector in early(a) years child care was noted in this Green Paper, and schemes such as inhabitation pop up were support. Home Start offered support to mothers of children aged under five. The Green Paper stressed the importance of formal and informal support net whole shebang in early years child care. The piece stressed that schemes were needed to meet the physiologic and turned on(p) needs of children, the social and educational needs of children, to help self-confidence in parenting and to provide respite to parents under stress. Home Start works with referrals from Health professionals, often to issues such as stress which is an affliction associate strongly to poverty. Schemes such as Home Start were not mean to act as a replacement to traditional social services (Frost, Johnson, Stein Wallis, 2000). As part of the Supporting Families Green Paper, responsibility for day do Centres was shifted by the regime from the Department of Health to the Department of raising (Moss, 2006).In 2000 the Children Needing Care Act was introduced to prevent su ch phenomena as foster drift (Eliot, 2006). The intention of this Act was very some(prenominal) to prevent a situation in which vulnerable young children fall entirely out of the social care system.In 2003 the Government published a get along Green Paper entitled Every Child Matters. This was to become a very important document in the governments social care policy. It was introduced largely as part of the fallout from the Victoria Climbie case, which had caused far-flung press outraged at failures which occurred in social care provision. The paper luck out five main aims for potentially vulnerable children. These aims were as follows to be healthy, to stay safe, to enjoy and reach, to make a positive contri hardlyion, and to achieve economic well-being. These aims were to underpin future government legislation on social policy (Stratham, 2004). The Childrens Act of 2004 was a further step towards performing upon the Every Child Matters Green Paper. It set up the new role of Chi ldren Commissioner a role independent of central government and concerned with the upbeat of children (Moss, 2006).The Care flavor Commission for England was launched as part of the Health and Social Care Act of 2008. This Act abolished some(prenominal) bodies to make way for this new Commission which was to be a new care standards regulatory authority whose mandate is to commix the areas of social care and health. By this time the governments approach of social care was becoming increasingly linked to the areas of physical health and wellbeing of young and vulnerable children. According to Stratham the desegregation of childrens social care with education and health was vital, as it helped to set up a proper new support service which was more likely to spot signs of neglect in early years (Stratham, 2004).It is garner that the government has moved in recent years to integrate several authorities with social care. The Health and Social Care Act of 2007 introduced measures to integrate social care between the services. At the same time it set up the new National run model, a ten year programme intended to stimulate long term improvements in childrens health. This Act was aimed at everyone who comes into contact with and delivers services to children. The current focus of the government is very much on early intervention, in the welfare of children. The Government now requires all local authorities to have a Children and new(a) Peoples Plan.When looking at this increased integration there are several arguments both for and against these developments. Whilst on the one hand these moves unquestionably make sense as these disciplines for certain are linked with each other, on the other hand the result of this can sometimes be an increased in paperwork, and an increasingly confused megalith in which one hand does not know what the other is doing. An increase in paperwork has sure as shooting been a complaint of other organisations under bleak Labour, most notably the Police. It is thence also worth noting that increasingly social services and the law of nature have been encouraged to work together in recent years, particularly in the area of childrens wellbeing. Members of social work teams are encouraged to contact a local Police Authorities Child vindication Officer. It is often difficult to coordinate services in whatever local authority, and when social services are required to cooperate with so legion(predicate) departments it seems inevitable that problems will occur. at that place is a further problem which is that any changes in the social care structure or methods to reduce poverty which are introduced tend to be slow to trickle down to the crap roots, and to those experiencing most poverty where this care is most needed (Penn Gough, 2002).The trend in the Governments approach to social care has changed in recent years to a shift towards empowering individuals involved in the system as opposed to forcing themsel ves onto people, as many felt was the case in the eighties. This seems to be backed up by the accession of procedures such as the judging Framework ( unsanded Statesman, 2007). One of the main strands of government policy has been the introduction of anti-poverty measures. This is why Gordon Browns introduction of the Sure Start initiative was astray seen as so important as it made an attempt to put an emphasis on children born into poverty (Kirk, 2003).One introduction knowing to help those on the receiving end of social care intervention was the harsh discernment Framework. A common parental complaint before the introduction of the Assessment Framework was a lack of information from social workers, regarding why they were being targeted and what the process was etc (Cleaver Walker, 2004). The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) is a assess approach to conducting an assessment of a childs individual needs. The Assessment Framework encourages parental involvement in the assess ment process, and means that social workers have to compare information. The main point of the Common Assessment Framework is to encourage social workers to talk through the role of the assessment framework with parents. Questions have been raised from certain sections of the social work connection about relevance of the assessment framework, with claims being made that some families find it intrusive. so far a report conducted by Cleaver and Walker entitled Assessing Childrens Needs and Circumstances suggests an improvement in the overall provision of social care since the Assessment Framework was introduced. Core assessment means there are in detail discussions between parents and social workers (Cleaver Walker, 2004).***The process of social work intervention is one which works on many levels. There is macro intervention by social workers which takes place in the community as a whole, however more relevant in this case is Micro intervention which is intervention on an individ ual level to those who are in most need of intervention. Local authorities can instill care proceedings in the protection of children. These proceedings are initiated in the case of fear of significant harm. There is confidentiality regarding reporting of abuses which are generally encouraged by the legal philosophy and social services but which can lead to abuses of the reporting system. A single incident will often trigger a referral if problems have been brewing for a while. hazard physical abuse is a prevalent issue, and one which social workers need to act most swiftly on, often in conjunction with the police (Cleaver Walker, 2004). Also if there is venture alcohol and drug abuse then this is a big problem where the raising of a child is concerned (Penn Gough, 2002).The importance of service user rights are paramount for many reasons. serve user rights are largely protected by processes such as the Assessment Framework, where users gain a greater understanding of the proc esses of the system. Those who report suspected abuses have confidentiality rights in the social work system. As has been mentioned many feel this can lead to abuses, are not helpful in explaining to those on the receiving end of social care interventions why they are being targeted.In the case of Karen it is clear that members of the social work team should tread carefully. On the one hand the identity of the neighbour who has reported the abuse must(prenominal) be protected. On the other hand Karen needs to be able to understand why she is being targeted, and therefore the various steps of the Assessment Framework need to be talked through with her. If there are problems regarding the childrens safety and hygiene it is vitally important that you liaise with the relevant health services, and work closely in conjunction with them. If your assessment shows neglect then the next step that you would have to taken is a potential greet action for care of the children. The ASPIRE model stands for Actualising Social and Personal identity element Resources. The Aspire Model has been designed to harness the potential associated with important subgroup social identities (Haslam, 2003). Application of that model within an organisation is specific to certain goals, and in this case this model can be useful in decently formalising integration between social work and other services.Discrimination is a problem for all social work departments, and there are many issues relating to discrimination which social work teams have to be very much aware of. It is important that social work should be non-stigmatising and it is also significant that it should not be discriminatory (Frost, Johnson, Stein Wallis, 2000). have intercourses which need to be taken into consideration include poverty an issue which is highly prevalent in Karens case and also issues of race and gender.It needs to be taken into account that most users of social care are female. This is firstly because f emales are often the primary carers of children (Kirk, 2003), however there are other nub reasons for this fact. Of the fifty parents surveyed in one study undertaken by Penn and Gough, only terzetto respondents were men. This is because of the fact that men tend to be less likely to want to liaise with social services, due to an overall suspicion of the process, and of receiving this sort of help in general (Penn Gough, 2002).Other studies seem to suggest racial minorities are less likely to be knowledgeable of the role that social services can play if they are experiencing problems. Some research suggests that Black and nonage Ethnic parents are less likely to be aware of the potential role that social services can play (Stratham, 2004), and are therefore less likely to seek help (Penn Gough, 2002). There are certainly problems is members of ethnic minorities are not fully integrated into the community. On conduce of these other discriminatory issues it is also widely consid ered that social care as it stands discriminates against the elderly and disabled in society (Guest, 2007).In Conclusion social work traditionally tends to focus on issues such as emotional support. However the issues which are raised by those who are users of social care tend to be more likely related to financial avail (Penn Gough, 2002). Against this backdrop the best that social care workers can do is to suss out that they work together with the relevant authorities, particularly those in health, to try and visualise the best start possible for children, and to root out potential neglect. At the same time they need to ensure they have good transaction with those whom they are trying to help, and this is why the Assessment Framework is so important. In this way if final decisions have to be taken then they will do, and it is vital that the intervention process is followed.BibliographyCass, B., Exploring Social Care Applying a New Construct to Young Carers and Grandparent Car ers, Australian Journal of Social gists, Volume 42. publicize 2, 2007Cleaver, H., Walker, S., Assessing Childrens Needs and Circumstances, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2004Eloit, A., Reflections on Working for Childrens Social Services in the United Kingdom, Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, Volume 9. Issue 1, 2006,Frost, N., Johnson, L., Stein, M., and Wallis, L., Home Start and the Delivery of Family Support, Children and Society, Vol 14, 2000Gilbert, F., Finally, Freedom Well Learn to Love the Bill, New Statesman, Volume 135. Issue 4782, March 6 2006Guest, The Wheels Are Coming off Social Care Our Way of Looking after the Old and disenable Is Already Failing and Will Get Worse, New Statesman, Volume 136. Issue 4864, October 1, 2007,Haslam, A., Social Identity at Work, Psychology Press, 2003Kirk, R. H., Family Support The Role of earlier Years Centres, Children and Society, Vol 17, 2003Moss, P., Farewell to Childcare?, National Institute Economic Review, Issue 195, 2006Penn, H., and Gough, D., The Price of a Loaf of Bread Some Conceptions of Family Support, Children and Society, Vol 16, 2002Stratham, J., Effective services to support children in special circumstances, Thomas Coran Research Unit, UCL, 2004National Service Framework Documents, Department of Health, cited at http//www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/NationalServiceFrameworks/Children/DH_4089111New Statesman, band Table A New Deal on Social Care? Participants Debate the Harsh Realities Confronting Society in Deciding the Kind of self-reliance We Want over Our Care and How We Can Find the Money to livestock It, Volume 136. Issue 4864, October 1, 2007,Western Mail, Discrimination of Princes Trust Loans and Grants, February 15, 2005,Western Mail, Quality of Patient Care Has to Be at the Heart of a modern Health Service, April 10, 2006,